Subscribe: Spotify | RSS | More

Jim talks with Tyson Yunkaporta—indigenous Australian scholar and author of Sand Talk, one of Jim’s top ten favorite books—about his metaphysics and worldview, the ecology of sex and creation, and how to wear rationalist and traditional knowledge frameworks simultaneously.

They discuss:

• Jim’s editorial endorsement of Sand Talk—”one of the top 10 best books I have ever read”
• Tyson’s trilogy of books
• Humans as a custodial species—sacred carers embedded in nature
• Who Tyson is when he wakes from deep sleep
• Tyson’s experience under general anesthesia—ten thousand years of deep dark oblivion
• How Jim shifted Tyson toward rationality and evidence-based thinking
• Tyson’s reassessment of peer review and collective scientific inquiry as similar to Indigenous processes of collective knowledge-building
• Tyson’s late initiation into the Apalech clan
• The distinction between “knowledge systems” and “knowledge of systems”
• Color blindness as a biological advantage in traditional systems knowledge
• What’s missing in people who haven’t gone through full initiation
• Men’s “belly spirit” (nenwi) and “spirit womb” in the Apalech tradition
• Images and ghosts—the shadow spirit as ego, and how infinite self-replication on social media drains the spirit
• Tyson’s cousin Eric becoming a viral meme and TikTok phenomenon
• Forager social operating systems and mechanisms to prevent dominant individuals
• Aboriginal law’s three core rights
• Sex as the center of everything
• Tyson’s response to Plato’s Cave
• Dreamtime and songlines as mistranslations
• Dreamtime as not an altered state but a continuous orientation
• The irony of mutual influence—Tyson becoming a rationalist skeptic partly through Jim; Jim becoming more open to spirit partly through Tyson
• The 3D glasses metaphor for wearing Indigenous and rationalist-materialist lenses simultaneously

… and much more.

Links

• Episode Transcript
• Snake Talk: How the World’s Ancient Serpent Stories Can Guide Us, by Tyson Yunkaporta and Megan Kelleher
• Sand Talk: How Indigenous Thinking Can Save the World, by Tyson Yunkaporta
• Right Story, Wrong Story, by Tyson Yunkaporta
• JRS EP 282 – Tyson Yunkaporta on Indigenous Law, Lore, and Learning
• JRS Currents 032 – Tyson Yunkaporta on Spirits, GameB & Protopias
• JRS EP 65 – Tyson Yunkaporta on Indigenous Complexity
• JRS EP 66 – Tyson Yunkaporta on Indigenous Knowledge
• JRS Currents 010 – Tyson Yunkaporta on Humans As Custodial Species
• “A Minimum Viable Metaphysics,” by Jim Rutt

Bio

Dr. Tyson Yunkaporta is an Aboriginal scholar, founder of the Indigenous Knowledge Systems Lab at Deakin University in Melbourne, and author of Sand Talk; Right Story, Wrong Story; and Snake Talk. His work focuses on applying Indigenous methods of inquiry to resolve complex issues and explore global crises.

Subscribe: Spotify | RSS | More

Jim talks with Lisa Buckingham—a veteran HR leader at Vialto Partners, US Soccer, Lincoln Financial, and Thomson—about how the LLM era is reshaping hiring and job architecture, and how companies and workers can roll with the changes.

They discuss:

• Jim and Lisa’s shared history in natural language processing labs thirty years ago—and the contrast with today, where “everybody can be an AI expert”
• The kind of people to hire in the age of LLMs: intellectual curiosity, learning agility, and willingness to work differently
• “Trust the machine, but always validate”—the principle of embracing AI while maintaining human oversight
• COVID as an accelerant of technology adoption
• Workforce adoption realities at Vialto—evangelists, pessimists, and the change management challenge
• Shark Tank-style internal AI contests as a model for engaging employees with new tools
• Why the “future of work” is dead
• Programmers and product managers merging roles; job architectures flattening into skills-based, fluid inventories
• AI’s historical weight—”as pivotal as electricity”—and the limits of anyone’s ability to predict machine learning’s trajectory
• Jim’s “what, when” framework and the twin failure modes of AI projects
• “Test and learn” as the right posture toward AI transformation, and whose responsibility “what, when” actually is—CEO, CTO, and sales as a coalition
• The productivity multiplier for programmers—7–10x gains—and Jim’s argument that demand for software could actually increase total programmer headcount
• Why sales jobs are probably not highly “AI-able” anytime soon, and what salespeople need to communicate to retain relevance
• Lisa’s personal use of Claude and Copilot 365
• The leveling effect of AI for non-STEM people
• Jim’s argument (since November 2022) that top liberal arts graduates are the most natural prompt engineers
• Lisa’s 1999 Georgetown thesis—”Are liberal arts majors the answer to the .com era worker shortage?”—and its uncanny parallel to the 2026 humanities debate
• The education paradox: how Lisa’s son was banned from using AI in class but required to be an AI expert for his summer internship
• The calculator analogy, and whether AI in education follows the same arc
• Resistance to the AI voice in writing
• Jim’s technique for capturing stylistic tendencies with AI
• The rising costs of frictional bureaucracy and the unreasonable effectiveness of small teams
• What Lisa saw on a recent safari about what AI can’t replace, and the choice between evolving and being overtaken
• Learning agility as the core HR question—how to handle employees who cannot or will not embrace AI
• The shifting meaning of “owning your work”

… and much more.

Links: 

• Episode Transcript
• Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI, by Ethan Mollick
• The Elements of Style, by William Strunk Jr. and E.B. White

Bio: 

Lisa M. Buckingham is a globally recognized human resources executive with over twenty-five years of experience leading people, culture, and transformation strategies across complex, mission-driven organizations. As Chief People & Culture Officer for Vialto, she oversees the company’s global people strategy, driving organizational performance and advancing a culture of inclusion and agility that supports Vialto’s purpose of helping people thrive in a global, mobile world.

Subscribe: Spotify | RSS | More

They discuss:

• • Peter’s self-description as “the music in a violin that can kind of hear itself”
  • The “Peter Wang-shaped hole in the universe” thought experiment
  • Subject-object Cartesian dualism as a false alienation
  • Minimum viable metaphysics & atheistic agnosticism
  • Religion as an evolutionary emergent coherence mechanism for human collectives
  • Figure and ground as a metaphysical lens—the anonymous soil that allows religion to sprout
  • The Unix fortune “Man was invented by water to carry itself uphill” & Peter’s teleology origin story
  • Process metaphysics & presentism—”we’re not going anywhere, we’re becoming someone”
  • Pirsig’s metaphysics of quality & the four strata of static patterns of value
  • The intellectual plane vs. the social plane & Ken Wilber’s pre-trans fallacy
  • Defection within collaborative groups as the dynamic all human social systems try to constrain
  • “Death from a Distance”—throwing, beta coalitions & the emergence of a middle class of power
  • Modernity’s shrinking locus of care & the collapse of embedded social context
  • The agglomeration of defectors & how fluid capital enables sociopathic hoarding
  • Money-on-money return as today’s dominant pruning rule
  • Joint attention as a scarce collective resource & social media’s perforation of shared intersubjective infrastructure
  • Human agency & “micro-abdications” as the aggregate source of Moloch / Game A
  • The augmented currency thought experiment—metering human thriving alongside financial returns
  • Broken collective sense-making & the search for dynamic, adaptable values
  • Peter’s secular conception of the sacred—the “eternal golden braid of humanity”
  • “Ofness”—holding both distinctness and belonging to the world

… and much more.

Links:

Subscribe: Spotify | RSS | More

Jim talks with recurring guest and deep systems thinker Jordan Hall about the scaffolding of his worldview. They discuss the waking-up scenario as a window into consciousness and personal identity, Jordan’s phenomenology of waking and the “latent potential of all possible memory,” the soul as the binding of finite and infinite, Jim’s counter-framing of consciousness as a fusion of perception, interoception, and unconscious memory, the infinite as genuinely real, the Platonic triangle as a concrete example of transcendentals that have no particular location in the causal field, Forrest Landry’s distinction between being and existence, knowing with confidence vs. knowing with certainty, Jordan’s basic ontological commitment to realism, the incoherence of simulation theory, Jim’s “Minimum Viable Metaphysics,” the incoherence of unmediated access as the meaning of the word reality, Father Stephen DeYoung’s critique of Western substantive essentialism, Bonitta Roy’s idea that reality is shareable and participatory, Michael Levin’s pragmatic epistemology, how purpose collapses reality to a tractable slice, “begottenness” in Christian metaphysics and the generativity of relationships, Jordan’s onto-epistemology as the register before ontology and epistemology are distinguishable, Jordan’s recent adoption of “smorthodox” Christianity, the phenomenology of waking as evidence that space-time is secondary, prioritizing meaningfulness over causation as a metaphysical commitment, Updike as “still alive” in the realization of his work, the Greek preoccupation with legacy and honor after death, Eric Weinstein’s desire for Einsteinian legacy as a category error, love as the real currency of legacy, the Mark Twain reading as an example of a soul genuinely present in a room, Jim’s father as an ongoing example of realization twenty-six years after his death, noticing a parent’s turn of phrase in oneself, the sweetness of impermanence, the good vs. abusive father and different relationships to a parent’s memory, values and virtues as real, the distinction between courage and bravery, culture as the progressive discovery and embodiment of virtue space, the crab-in-the-bucket problem, fallenness as local optimization, and much more.

• Episode Transcript
• deepcode (Jordan’s Substack)
• JRS EP 284 Jordan Hall on AI, the Commons, and the Church
• JRS EP 255 Is God Real? (with Jordan Hall)
• JRS EP 223 Jordan Hall on Cities, Civiums, and Becoming Christian
• JRS EP 170 John Vervaeke and Jordan Hall on The Religion That Is Not a Religion
• JRS EP26 Jordan Hall on the Game B Emergence
• JRS EP8 Jordan “Greenhall” Hall and Game B
• “Minimum Viable Metaphysics”, by Jim Rutt
• JRS EP 341 Worldviews: Bonnitta Roy on Post-Formal Actors, Stage Theory, and the Character Void in Leadership

Jordan Hall is the Co-founder and Executive Chairman of the Neurohacker Collective. He is now in his 18th year of building disruptive technology companies. Jordan’s interests in comics, science fiction, computers, and way too much TV led to a deep dive into contemporary philosophy (particularly the works of Gilles Deleuze and Manuel DeLanda), artificial intelligence and complex systems science, and then, as the Internet was exploding into the world, a few years at Harvard Law School where he spent time with Larry Lessig, Jonathan Zittrain and Cornel West examining the coevolution of human civilization and technology.